Skip to content
alyn
affaan-m

Agentic Engineering skill

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when planning or executing engineering work that agents will carry out end to end.

$npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill agentic-engineering
GitHub stars
300,768
Pack installs
1.7M
Alyn Score
88/99
Updated
2 days ago
License
MIT

Install Agentic Engineering

Pick your agent. Every command is ready to paste.

$npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill agentic-engineering

The open skills CLI detects your agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ more) and installs to the right folder. Add -g to install globally.

01

Install it

Run the command above, or upload the folder in Claude.

02

Ask naturally

Describe the task. Your agent loads agentic-engineering when the request matches its description.

03

Name it if needed

If it does not trigger, say “use the agentic-engineering skill”. In Codex, type $agentic-engineering.

The skill itself

SKILL.md

GitHub

Agentic Engineering

Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.

Operating Principles

  1. Define completion criteria before execution.
  2. Decompose work into agent-sized units.
  3. Route model tiers by task complexity.
  4. Measure with evals and regression checks.

Eval-First Loop

  1. Define capability eval and regression eval.
  2. Run baseline and capture failure signatures.
  3. Execute implementation.
  4. Re-run evals and compare deltas.

Task Decomposition

Apply the 15-minute unit rule:

  • each unit should be independently verifiable
  • each unit should have a single dominant risk
  • each unit should expose a clear done condition

Model Routing

  • Haiku: classification, boilerplate transforms, narrow edits
  • Sonnet: implementation and refactors
  • Opus: architecture, root-cause analysis, multi-file invariants

Session Strategy

  • Continue session for closely-coupled units.
  • Start fresh session after major phase transitions.
  • Compact after milestone completion, not during active debugging.

Review Focus for AI-Generated Code

Prioritize:

  • invariants and edge cases
  • error boundaries
  • security and auth assumptions
  • hidden coupling and rollout risk

Do not waste review cycles on style-only disagreements when automated format/lint already enforce style.

Interpret Tool Results Before Comparing Data

For document reads and processing loops, check three boundaries in order:

  1. Check the tool/transport envelope for an error or an indeterminate outcome.
  2. Decode the response and check operation status using that tool's documented contract. An outer success flag or a present payload does not establish that the requested operation succeeded. Status may live in structured content, decoded text, or another documented field; result.ok is not a universal MCP field. Missing or unrecognized status stays unknown.
  3. Only after confirmed operation success, validate the document shape and compare its fields. An operation failure is not a document identity mismatch.

Keep the operation name, request/correlation ID when available, relevant status and error details, and the original response needed for diagnosis. Redact secrets and private document data before logging or sharing. Do not reconstruct missing responses from a later response's shape.

Portable Classification Example

The adapter below uses an illustrative read-tool contract, not an MCP schema: isError is a required boolean; when false, result.ok is a required operation status. A successful read returns result.document with a string id; a failed read may carry result.error. Replace this adapter with the actual tool's contract, including its documented decoding and document validation rules.

function decodeRead(response) {
  if (!response || typeof response.isError !== 'boolean') {
    return { kind: 'unknown_response' };
  }
  if (response.isError) return { kind: 'tool_error' };

  const result = response.result;
  if (result?.ok === false) {
    return { kind: 'operation_error', error: result.error };
  }
  if (result?.ok !== true) return { kind: 'unknown_response' };

  const document = result.document;
  if (!document || typeof document.id !== 'string') {
    return { kind: 'invalid_document' };
  }
  return { kind: 'document', document };
}

function inspectRead(response, expectedId, decode = decodeRead) {
  const outcome = decode(response);
  if (outcome.kind !== 'document') return outcome;

  return outcome.document.id === expectedId
    ? { kind: 'match', document: outcome.document }
    : { kind: 'field_mismatch', actualId: outcome.document.id, expectedId };
}

Synthetic evaluation cases (not a reproduction of any historical incident):

Input under this illustrative contract Expected classification
isError: true tool_error; no field comparison
isError: false, result.ok: false, maintenance error, no document operation_error; preserve maintenance details, no mismatch
isError: false, missing operation status unknown_response; no field comparison
Confirmed success, missing document or non-string ID invalid_document; no field comparison
Confirmed success, valid document with expected ID match
Confirmed success, valid document with a different ID field_mismatch

Classification does not authorize a write or retry. Temporary maintenance remains an operation failure with its own evidence; follow the tool's documented recovery policy. A documented service-wide maintenance failure should stop a batch rather than trigger the same request for every row; a lone authorization error does not establish service-wide maintenance. If a write times out or its outcome is unknown, preserve that uncertainty and reconcile using a documented status/read-back mechanism before considering a retry. Never infer that a write failed, repeat it, or overwrite a document solely because a read failed or a returned field differs.

Cost Discipline

Track per task:

  • model
  • token estimate
  • retries
  • wall-clock time
  • success/failure

Escalate model tier only when lower tier fails with a clear reasoning gap.

Tips for Agentic Engineering

  • • Start a fresh session after installing so your agent picks up the new skill.
  • • It is part of a pack with 40 skills. Install only the ones you need with --skill to keep triggers precise.
  • • If two skills overlap, mention the one you want by name.

Questions about Agentic Engineering

What does the Agentic Engineering skill do?

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when planning or executing engineering work that agents will carry out end to end.

How do I install Agentic Engineering?

Run "npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill agentic-engineering" in your project. The skills CLI installs it for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ other agents. In Claude on the web, upload the skill folder as a ZIP under Customize > Skills.

Does Agentic Engineering work in Cursor and Codex?

Yes. Agentic Engineering uses the open SKILL.md format, so it works in Claude Code, Claude, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and other agents that support agent skills.

Is Agentic Engineering free?

Agentic Engineering is open source on GitHub under the MIT license. It is free to install; check the license before commercial use.

Who made Agentic Engineering?

Agentic Engineering is published by affaan-m in the affaan-m/ECC repository, together with 39 other skills.

Similar skills. From other creators.