Skip to content
alyn
GPTomics

Bio Single Cell Splicing skill

Analyzes alternative splicing at single-cell resolution. The first decision is library chemistry — 10X 3' is fundamentally limited (RT primes from poly-A, R2 falls in 3' UTR, <0.1 junction read per cell per AS event). Plate-based full-length methods (Smart-seq3, FLASH-seq, VASA-seq, STORM-seq) and single-cell long-read (MAS-Iso-seq, scISOr-Seq2) are the chemistries that give per-cell isoform structure. Tools include

$npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-single-cell-splicing
View this skill on GitHubGPTomics/bioSkills/alternative-splicing/single-cell-splicing/SKILL.md
Pack stars
1,235
Pack installs
1.3k
Alyn Score
55/99
Updated
3 months ago
License
MIT
– views – installs via Alyn

Install Bio Single Cell Splicing

Pick your agent. Every command is ready to paste.

$npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-single-cell-splicing

The open skills CLI detects your agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ more) and installs to the right folder. Add -g to install globally.

01

Install it

Run the command above, or upload the folder in Claude.

02

Ask naturally

Describe the task. Your agent loads bio-single-cell-splicing when the request matches its description.

03

Name it if needed

If it does not trigger, say “use the bio-single-cell-splicing skill”. In Codex, type $bio-single-cell-splicing.

The skill itself

SKILL.md

FolderGitHub

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: MARVEL 2.0+, BRIE2 0.2.4+, scQuint 0.1+, SpliZ 0.0.1+, Sierra 1.0+, Psix 0.1+, anndata 0.10+, scanpy 1.10+, pandas 2.2+, scipy 1.13+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
  • R: packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parameters
  • CLI: <tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Single-Cell Splicing Analysis

The fundamental decision is chemistry, not tool. Most droplet 3' scRNA-seq cannot support transcriptome-wide splicing inference because reverse transcription primes from the poly(A) tail and most reads land in the 3' UTR — far from CDS-region splicing events. Plate-based full-length methods and single-cell long-read sequencing are the chemistries that give per-cell isoform structure across the gene body.

The 10X 3' Problem (Quantified)

Three compounding mechanisms make 10X Chromium 3' (v3.1, GEM-X, v4) hostile to splicing:

  1. 3' enrichment: median fragment <1 kb from poly(A); >70% of unique reads fall within 3' UTR.
  2. Short R2 (~91 nt): each read straddles at most one junction; usually none, because R2 lands in 3' UTR.
  3. PCR concatemers and TSO artifacts: pollute junction detection; UMI collapse is gene-level, not isoform-level.

Quantitative estimate: Only a small fraction of cassette exons sit close enough to the polyA site to be sampled by 3' chemistry (empirical estimates from APA/3'-end atlases — see Tian & Manley 2017 Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol for the 3' UTR isoform landscape). Effective junction read yield from 10X 3' is <0.1 per cell per AS event — vs the 5-10 needed for stable per-cell PSI. Most splicing analyses on 10X 3' data report artifacts.

The 5' kit (10X 5' GEX) does not solve this — it shifts capture from 3' UTR to 5' UTR / TSS-proximal regions. Marginal improvement; not a transcriptome-wide solution. Note that V(D)J recovery requires the 10X Chromium Single Cell Immune Profiling kit (with TCR/BCR-specific enrichment), not 5' GEX alone — postdocs designing immune-repertoire experiments must use the dedicated V(D)J kit.

Decision: Does the Chemistry Support Splicing Analysis?

Chemistry Splicing analysis viable? Best alternative if no
10X 3' (Chromium v3, GEM-X, v4, Flex) No (transcriptome-wide); maybe near-3'-end events Sierra for APA
10X 5' GEX Limited; near-5'-end events only Sierra for alternative TSS; switch to MAS-Iso-seq
Smart-seq2 Yes (full transcript) MARVEL or BRIE2
Smart-seq3 / Smart-seq3xpress Yes + UMI molecule counting MARVEL or BRIE2
FLASH-seq Yes (faster, cheaper Smart-seq3) MARVEL or BRIE2
VASA-seq Yes + total RNA (incl. nascent, IR) MARVEL with IR analysis
STORM-seq Yes + total RNA + ribodepletion MARVEL with IR analysis
MAS-Iso-seq + 10X 5' (PacBio Kinnex) Yes — full isoforms per cell FLAMES, scNanoGPS, IsoQuant, see long-read-splicing
scISOr-Seq2 (PacBio + 10X) Yes — full isoforms with cell-typing FLAMES, IsoQuant
ONT direct cDNA scRNA Yes FLAMES
ONT direct RNA scRNA Yes + native modifications FLAMES

Tool Selection Matrix

Tool Best for Input Strengths Fails when
MARVEL Smart-seq plate-based and (v2+) 10X droplet unified workflow Plate or droplet BAMs + Seurat SE/A5SS/A3SS/MXE/RI/AFE/ALE; modality classification; native Seurat integration; v2 droplet support R-only
BRIE2 Plate-based with regulatory feature prior Plate BAM + GFF3 events Bayesian variational PSI + ELBO_gain test; principled uncertainty; CLI-driven (brie-count, brie-quant) TensorFlow dependency; slow at scale
scQuint Plate-based annotation-free junction-cluster quantification (validated on Smart-seq2) STAR junctions across cells Cluster-level junction usage; latent Dirichlet Authors recommend AGAINST use on 10X 3'/5' data (3'-bias confounds); plate-based only
SpliZ Annotation-free discovery of cell-state-associated splicing STAR-aligned BAMs Per-gene Z-score; no event database needed Annotation-free = power tradeoff
Psix Regulated AS along trajectories PSI matrix + kNN graph Tests graph smoothness; robust to dropout Needs cell-state graph upstream
Sierra APA in 10X 3' (NOT splicing) 10X BAM + GTF Peak-calling 3' ends; DEXSeq DTU on UTR isoforms APA only; not for cassette exons
pseudobulk leafcutter / rMATS Between-cell-type differential splicing Aggregated BAMs Bulk-level statistical power Loses within-cluster heterogeneity
MAS-Iso-seq + FLAMES Full-length single-cell isoforms 10X 5' + PacBio Kinnex Full isoforms per cell at scale Cost; complex pipeline

Decision Tree by Goal

Goal Recommended approach
"Will my 10X 3' data support splicing?" No transcriptome-wide; consider Sierra for APA. Note: scQuint authors recommend against use on 10X data
Cassette exon analysis in cell types from Smart-seq2 MARVEL with ComputePSI + AssignModality + CompareValues
Discover cell-state-associated splicing without an event database SpliZ
Test regulated AS along developmental pseudotime Psix
Per-cell PSI with uncertainty in low-coverage cells BRIE2
Differential splicing between two well-defined cell types Pseudobulk leafcutter or rMATS on aggregated BAMs
APA (alternative polyadenylation, often confused with AS) Sierra
Full-length single-cell isoforms at scale MAS-Iso-seq + FLAMES (long-read)
Microexons (3-27 nt) Long-read or aligner with low overhang (uLTRA, deSALT)
snRNA-seq (nuclei) — IR question Library captures nuclear RNA enriched for incomplete splicing — interpret IR cautiously

MARVEL Plate-Based Workflow

Goal: Run a unified workflow from STAR junctions to cell-type-specific splicing calls.

Approach: Build a wide splice-junction count matrix (rows = junctions keyed by coord.intron, columns = cells), assemble per-event feature tables, then construct MARVEL object with named slots (SpliceJunction, SplicePheno, SpliceFeature, IntronCounts, GeneFeature, Exp, GTF). Quantify PSI per event class, classify modality, test differential splicing.

library(MARVEL); library(Seurat); library(data.table)

seurat_obj <- readRDS('cells.rds')

# Build wide SJ matrix: first column 'coord.intron' (e.g. 'chr1:100007082:100022621'),
# subsequent columns are per-cell sample IDs with junction counts as values.
# This is constructed from STAR SJ.out.tab files (one per cell) merged on intron coord.
sj_files <- list.files('star_pass2/', pattern='SJ.out.tab$', full.names=TRUE)
sj_long <- rbindlist(lapply(sj_files, function(f) {
    d <- fread(f, sep='\t', header=FALSE,
               col.names=c('chr','start','end','strand','motif','annot','unique','multi','overhang'))
    d$coord.intron <- paste(d$chr, d$start, d$end, sep=':')
    d$sample <- gsub('_SJ.out.tab$', '', basename(f))
    d[, .(coord.intron, sample, unique)]
}))
sj <- dcast(sj_long, coord.intron ~ sample, value.var='unique', fill=0)

# SpliceFeature is a NAMED LIST keyed by event class
df.feature.list <- list(
    SE   = read.table('events_SE.txt',   header=TRUE, sep='\t'),
    A5SS = read.table('events_A5SS.txt', header=TRUE, sep='\t'),
    A3SS = read.table('events_A3SS.txt', header=TRUE, sep='\t'),
    MXE  = read.table('events_MXE.txt',  header=TRUE, sep='\t'),
    RI   = read.table('events_RI.txt',   header=TRUE, sep='\t')
)

# SplicePheno: per-cell metadata; sample.id column maps to SpliceJunction column names
df.pheno <- seurat_obj@meta.data
df.pheno$sample.id <- rownames(df.pheno)

marvel <- CreateMarvelObject(
    SpliceJunction = sj,
    SplicePheno    = df.pheno,
    SpliceFeature  = df.feature.list,
    GeneFeature    = read.table('gene_features.tsv', header=TRUE, sep='\t'),
    Exp            = read.table('tpm.tsv', header=TRUE, sep='\t', row.names=1),
    GTF            = rtracklayer::import('annotation.gtf')
)

marvel <- ComputePSI(marvel, CoverageThreshold=10, EventType='SE')
marvel <- AssignModality(marvel, EventType='SE')
marvel <- CompareValues(
    marvel,
    cell.group.g1 = neurons, cell.group.g2 = glia,
    method = 'wilcox', n.cells = 25, psi.delta = 0.1
)

For 10X droplet data, MARVEL v2+ provides CreateMarvelObject.10x() and AnnotateSJ.10x() constructors. Verify the exact API via ?CreateMarvelObject.10x in installed MARVEL.

MARVEL classifies events into modalities (Song 2017 Mol Cell): included (PSI1), excluded (PSI0), bimodal (mixture at 0/1), middle (peaked ~0.5), multimodal. Bimodality usually reflects mixed cell states or stochastic monoallelic-like bursting. Mid-modality (peaked at 0.5) can be technical (mixed cells in a droplet) — confirm with full-length data.

BRIE2 Bayesian PSI

Goal: Estimate per-cell PSI with informative regulatory-feature prior; test cell-state association via likelihood-ratio testing on covariate effects.

Approach: BRIE2 is a CLI-driven workflow (brie-count for read counting, brie-quant for variational inference + LRT). Prepare a GFF3 of splicing events, count cell-barcoded junction reads, then fit the model with covariate testing.

# 1. Count splicing events per cell
brie-count \
    -a splicing_events.gff3 \
    -S sample_list.tsv \
    -o brie_counts/ \
    -p 16

# 2. Fit BRIE2 with LRT against the cell-type covariate
brie-quant \
    -i brie_counts/brie_count.h5ad \
    -c cell_metadata.tsv \
    -o brie_quant.h5ad \
    --interceptMode gene \
    --LRTindex All \
    --testBase null \
    --MCsize 3 \
    --batchSize 1000000 \
    -p 16

--interceptMode gene fits a gene-specific intercept (recommended); --LRTindex All tests all covariates; --testBase null uses the null model as the LRT reference. Verify exact flag set via brie-quant -h in installed BRIE2.

import scanpy as sc

adata_splice = sc.read_h5ad('brie_quant.h5ad')
# Per-event covariate effects, ELBO values, and LRT statistics live in
# adata_splice.varm and adata_splice.var; column names depend on BRIE2 version.
# Inspect with: print(adata_splice); print(adata_splice.varm.keys())
# Per-event significance is typically derived from LRT delta-ELBO.

BRIE2 (Huang & Sanguinetti 2021 Genome Biol) uses a sequence-derived feature prior (exon length, GC content, splice site strength, motif counts) to regularize PSI estimates in low-coverage cells. The LRT-based covariate test answers "is this event associated with cell state?" without requiring per-cell PSI accuracy. Threshold the delta-ELBO at ~3 (analogous to log-Bayes-factor); confirm against version-specific output keys via the brie-tutorials repo.

SpliZ for Annotation-Free Discovery

Goal: Identify splicing-defined cell populations without an event database.

Approach: Compute per-gene splicing Z-score across cells; test for cell-state association via permutation.

# SpliZ is a Nextflow pipeline (not a standalone CLI). Configure inputs in a .config
# file (dataname, input_file, libraryType, grouping_level_1/2) - either SICILIAN
# output (SICILIAN=true) or BAMs via a samplesheet CSV + metadata + GTF (SICILIAN=false).
nextflow run salzmanlab/spliz -r main -latest -c spliz.config

SpliZ (Olivieri 2022 Nat Methods) is robust to dropout because it pools junction information across the gene; particularly useful for discovering splicing diversity in heterogeneous tumor samples.

Psix for Regulated AS Along Trajectories

Goal: Detect AS that varies coherently with cell state along a developmental trajectory, robust to dropout.

Approach: Score whether observed PSI is smooth on the cell-cell kNN graph from expression-space embedding.

import psix
import scanpy as sc

adata = sc.read_h5ad('cells.h5ad')
sc.pp.neighbors(adata, n_neighbors=30, use_rep='X_pca')

psix_obj = psix.Psix(adata, psi_matrix_path='psi_matrix.tsv')
psix_obj.run_psix()

regulated = psix_obj.psix_results.query('psix_score > 1.5 and pvalue < 0.05')

Psix (Buen Abad Najar 2022 Genome Res 32:1385) is the principled alternative to imputing PSI: do not impute (it obliterates heterogeneity); test for graph smoothness instead.

Sierra for APA (Not Splicing)

Goal: Detect alternative polyadenylation in 10X 3' data — frequently confounded with AS.

Approach: Peak-call read pile-ups at 3' ends, then DEXSeq-style DTU on 3' UTR isoforms.

library(Sierra)

peak_file <- FindPeaks(
    output.file = 'peaks.txt',
    gtf.file = 'annotation.gtf',
    bam.file = 'possorted_genome_bam.bam'
)

counts <- CountPeaks(
    peak.sites.file = 'peaks.txt',
    gtf.file = 'annotation.gtf',
    bamfile = 'possorted_genome_bam.bam',
    whitelist.file = 'barcodes.tsv'
)

# CountPeaks returns a peak x cell matrix; annotate it and build a peak Seurat
# object before differential-usage testing.
peak.annotations <- AnnotatePeaksFromGTF(
    peak.sites.file = 'peaks.txt',
    gtf.file = 'annotation.gtf',
    output.file = 'peak_annotations.txt'
)

peaks.seurat <- NewPeakSeurat(
    peak.data = counts,
    annot.info = peak.annotations,
    cell.idents = cell_identities
)

apa_results <- DUTest(peaks.seurat, population.1 = ctrl_cells, population.2 = trt_cells)

If only 10X 3' data is available, this is often what is actually wanted. Distinct UTRs change miRNA targeting, RBP binding, and stability — biologically meaningful but not splicing.

Pseudobulk for Statistical Power

Goal: Recover bulk-level statistical power for differential splicing between cell types.

Approach: Sum junction counts across cells of the same cluster, then run leafcutter / rMATS on aggregated counts.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

def pseudobulk_junctions(junction_counts, cell_metadata, groupby='cell_type'):
    out = {}
    for group, cells in cell_metadata.groupby(groupby).groups.items():
        mask = junction_counts.columns.isin(cells)
        out[group] = junction_counts.loc[:, mask].sum(axis=1)
    return pd.DataFrame(out)

Use pseudobulk for differential splicing between well-defined cell types; use per-cell methods for within-population heterogeneity (graded splicing along pseudotime, bimodal cell-state mixtures).

Single-Cell Long-Read = Future of Single-Cell Splicing

In 2024-2026, full-length single-cell long-read sequencing has become practical and is the recommended chemistry for splicing-focused single-cell experiments:

  • MAS-Iso-seq / PacBio Kinnex: concatenated full-length cDNA arrays, ~16x throughput vs plain Iso-Seq, compatible with 10X 5' libraries (Al'Khafaji 2024 Nat Biotech)
  • scISOr-Seq2: hybrid 10X + PacBio for cell typing + isoform structure (Joglekar et al 2024 Nat Neurosci 27:1051-1063, single-cell long-read brain isoform mapping)
  • ONT direct cDNA + 10X: lower cost, similar information content
  • FLAMES: barcode demultiplexing + isoform quantification + SNV calling for ONT scRNA (Tian 2021 Genome Biol 22:310)

For splicing-specific full-length single-cell analysis, see long-read-splicing skill.

Per-Tool Failure Modes

MARVEL: SpliceJunction Matrix Format

Trigger: Building the SpliceJunction matrix from STAR SJ.out.tab incorrectly (e.g. long-format instead of wide).

Mechanism: MARVEL plate-based CreateMarvelObject(SpliceJunction = ...) expects a wide matrix with first column coord.intron (formatted chr:start:end) and subsequent columns being per-cell sample IDs with integer junction counts. Long-format data.frames or missing coord.intron column cause runtime errors.

Symptom: "no coord.intron column found" errors; or empty PSI tables despite junction reads being present.

Fix: Verify wide-matrix structure; ensure SJ.out.tabs are merged on the chr:start:end key with cells as columns. Use data.table::dcast for the long->wide reshape.

BRIE2: TensorFlow Memory

Trigger: Large cohort (>10k cells) with deep coverage.

Mechanism: Variational inference loads full count matrix; TensorFlow allocates GPU memory aggressively.

Symptom: OOM kills; training stalls.

Fix: Reduce --batchSize from default (500000) to 100000 or 50000; train per-chromosome batch; use CPU mode for very small cohorts. Note flag is camelCase --batchSize, not --batch_size.

scQuint: 3' Data Sparsity

Trigger: Running scQuint on 10X 3' v3 data hoping for splicing signal.

Mechanism: scQuint's latent Dirichlet model needs junction counts; 10X 3' yields too few junction reads to fit the model robustly.

Symptom: All cells assign to one cluster; no informative splicing signal.

Fix: Pivot to APA analysis with Sierra; or upgrade chemistry to MAS-Iso-seq.

Psix: Missing kNN Graph

Trigger: Running Psix without precomputed cell-cell graph.

Mechanism: Psix tests PSI smoothness on a pre-existing cell-cell graph; without one, no smoothness statistic.

Symptom: Empty results or error about missing connectivities.

Fix: Run sc.pp.neighbors(adata) before Psix; ensure connectivities is in adata.obsp.

Sierra: Annotation Gaps

Trigger: GTF missing 3'UTR annotations.

Mechanism: Sierra peak-calls within annotated 3'UTRs; missing annotations mean missed peaks.

Symptom: Few peaks detected; gene-level coverage but no APA calls.

Fix: Use comprehensive GENCODE annotation; or run de-novo peak calling first.

Reconciliation: When Single-Cell Tools Disagree

Pattern Likely cause Action
MARVEL sig, BRIE2 not Per-cell PSI noise (BRIE2 conservative); MARVEL pseudobulk-like Trust MARVEL for cell-type comparisons; BRIE2 for within-cluster
BRIE2 sig, MARVEL not Cell-state effect smoother than cell-type boundary Test along trajectory with Psix
SpliZ sig, MARVEL not Annotation-free SpliZ catches novel events Investigate junction structure manually
Sierra sig, MARVEL not Sierra is APA, MARVEL is splicing — different biology Distinguish in interpretation
Pseudobulk sig, per-cell not Power issue; effect averaged out per-cell Report at cluster level, not per-cell

Quantitative Concepts Unique to Single-Cell

Per-cell PSI vs pseudobulk PSI:

  • Per-cell PSI: meaningful only when junction coverage exceeds ~10-20 reads per cell per event (plate-based or long-read).
  • Pseudobulk PSI: aggregate, recovers bulk-level statistical power, discards within-cluster heterogeneity.

Modality detection in PSI distributions (Song 2017 Mol Cell):

Modality PSI distribution Biology
Included Peaked at 1 Constitutive inclusion
Excluded Peaked at 0 Constitutive skipping
Bimodal Mixture at 0 and 1 Mixed cell states or monoallelic-like bursting
Middle Peaked ~0.5 Often technical (well-contamination, doublets, or low-coverage shrinkage to prior); confirm with full-length
Multimodal Multiple peaks Complex regulation; deserves follow-up

Beta-binomial vs binomial models: with sparse counts, binomial PSI is overdispersed. Beta-binomial models (BRIE2; leafcutter2 as Dirichlet-multinomial cluster-level) handle this. For very sparse droplet data, even beta-binomial fits poorly per cell — collapse to pseudobulk.

Imputation pitfalls: naive imputation (MAGIC, scImpute, ALRA) of expression matrices is not appropriate for PSI: imputing missing junction counts averages over neighboring cells and obliterates the very heterogeneity under study. Psix's approach — testing smoothness of observed PSI on the kNN graph — is the principled alternative.

Cell-Type-Specific Splicing Biology

System Event Regulator
Neural microexons 3-27 nt exons enriched in brain SRRM4/nSR100 (Irimia 2014 Cell); SRRM3 in retina/photoreceptors (Ciampi 2022 PNAS)
Neural differentiation PTBP1 -> PTBP2 switch miR-124 represses PTBP1; derepresses neural exons (Boutz 2007 Genes Dev)
T-cell activation CD45 RA -> RO hnRNP-L, ESRP-mediated
Erythropoiesis EPB41 exon 16 Splicing factor switching during maturation
Cardiac development TTN N2BA -> N2B MBNL1/CELF1 antagonism
EMT FGFR2 IIIb -> IIIc, ENAH exon 11a ESRP1/2 loss in mesenchymal state (Warzecha 2009 Mol Cell)
Activated T cell CD45 isoform shift Multiple SR/hnRNP regulators

Quality Thresholds

Metric Recommendation
Cells per event with reads >=50 (per-cell PSI); >=200 cells per cluster (pseudobulk)
Junction reads per event per cell >=5 with coverage; <=1 = unreliable
PSI variance for cell-type call <0.1 within cluster, >0.2 between clusters
Library full-length plate or long-read for transcriptome-wide; 3' for APA only
Doublet filtering Required before splicing analysis (DoubletFinder, Scrublet)
Cells per cluster (pseudobulk) >=100 ideal; >=50 minimum
nuclear vs whole-cell snRNA-seq enriches IR; treat with caution

Common Errors

Error Cause Solution
MARVEL: ComputePSI returns empty STAR SJ.out.tab missing strand info Re-run STAR with --outSJtype Standard
brie.tl.fit: NaN loss Insufficient junction reads per cell Filter cells with min_reads=20; raise threshold
scQuint: convergence not reached LDA model fit on too-few junctions Aggregate by chromosome; or switch chemistry
Psix: missing connectivities Neighbors graph not computed Run sc.pp.neighbors(adata) first
Sierra: no peaks called GTF missing 3'UTR annotations Use comprehensive GENCODE; or de-novo peak-call
MARVEL: ggplot error Seurat version mismatch Match MARVEL and Seurat versions
FLAMES: barcode rescue failed Short-read 10X output not in expected directory Verify cellranger output structure

Common Pitfalls

  • Treating 10X 3' splicing analysis as legitimate — the chemistry doesn't support it. Use Sierra for APA or upgrade to MAS-Iso-seq.
  • Imputing PSI matrices — destroys the heterogeneity to be detected. Use Psix or BRIE2 instead.
  • Per-cell PSI on droplet data — typically too sparse for stable estimates. Use pseudobulk first, then drill down to per-cell.
  • Confusing APA with splicing — Sierra results look like AS but are 3' UTR isoforms. Different machinery, different biology.
  • snRNA-seq IR signal misinterpreted as splicing dysregulation — nuclear RNA is enriched for incompletely spliced transcripts; baseline IR is high.
  • Trusting per-cell PSI from BRIE2 without ELBO_gain test — BRIE2's per-cell point estimates are noisy; the principled output is the ELBO_gain cell-state-association statistic.
  • Microexon analysis with default short-read aligners — anchors >=20 nt miss most microexons; use VAST-TOOLS, MicroExonator, or long-read.
  • Skipping doublet filtering before splicing — doublets create artificial PSI mid-modality.
  • single-cell/preprocessing - QC and normalization (must run before splicing)
  • single-cell/clustering - Cell type annotation prerequisite
  • single-cell/doublet-detection - Doublet filtering critical for splicing
  • single-cell/data-io - h5ad / Seurat I/O
  • splicing-quantification - Bulk RNA-seq comparison context
  • long-read-splicing - Full-isoform analysis from MAS-Iso-seq, scISOr-Seq2; future of single-cell splicing

References

  • Huang & Sanguinetti 2021 Genome Biol - BRIE2
  • Wen et al 2023 Nucleic Acids Research 51:e29 - MARVEL
  • Benegas, Fischer & Song 2022 eLife - scQuint (annotation-free single-cell splicing analysis, validated on Smart-seq2)
  • Olivieri et al 2022 Nat Methods - SpliZ
  • Buen Abad Najar et al 2022 Genome Research 32:1385 - Psix
  • Patrick et al 2020 Genome Biol - Sierra
  • Song et al 2017 Mol Cell - splicing modality classification
  • Picelli et al 2014 Nat Protoc - Smart-seq2
  • Hagemann-Jensen et al 2020 Nat Biotech - Smart-seq3
  • Hagemann-Jensen et al 2022 Nat Biotech - Smart-seq3xpress
  • Hahaut et al 2022 Nat Biotech - FLASH-seq
  • Salmen et al 2022 Nat Biotech - VASA-seq
  • Johnson et al 2022 bioRxiv 10.1101/2022.03.14.484332 - STORM-seq (preprint)
  • Al'Khafaji et al 2024 Nat Biotech - MAS-Iso-seq / Kinnex
  • Tian et al 2021 Genome Biology 22:310 - FLAMES
  • Joglekar et al 2024 Nat Neurosci 27:1051-1063 - scISOr-Seq2 single-cell brain isoform mapping
  • Irimia et al 2014 Cell - neural microexons / SRRM4
  • Ciampi et al 2022 PNAS 119:e2117090119 - SRRM3-dependent photoreceptor microexons
  • Boutz et al 2007 Genes Dev - PTBP1/PTBP2 neural switch
  • Tian & Manley 2017 Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol - alternative polyadenylation and 3' UTR isoforms

Tips for Bio Single Cell Splicing

  • • Start a fresh session after installing so your agent picks up the new skill.
  • • This skill ships scripts. Read them before the first run, and run it in a project without secrets first.
  • • It bundles reference files. The agent reads them only when needed, so they cost no context until then.
  • • It is part of a pack with 30 skills. Install only the ones you need with --skill to keep triggers precise.
  • • If two skills overlap, mention the one you want by name.

Questions about Bio Single Cell Splicing

What does the Bio Single Cell Splicing skill do?

Analyzes alternative splicing at single-cell resolution. The first decision is library chemistry — 10X 3' is fundamentally limited (RT primes from poly-A, R2 falls in 3' UTR, <0.1 junction read per cell per AS event). Plate-based full-length methods (Smart-seq3, FLASH-seq, VASA-seq, STORM-seq) and single-cell long-read (MAS-Iso-seq, scISOr-Seq2) are the chemistries that give per-cell isoform structure. Tools include

How do I install Bio Single Cell Splicing?

Run "npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-single-cell-splicing" in your project. The skills CLI installs it for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ other agents. In Claude on the web, upload the skill folder as a ZIP under Customize > Skills.

Does Bio Single Cell Splicing work in Cursor and Codex?

Yes. Bio Single Cell Splicing uses the open SKILL.md format, so it works in Claude Code, Claude, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and other agents that support agent skills.

Is Bio Single Cell Splicing free?

Bio Single Cell Splicing is open source on GitHub under the MIT license. It is free to install; check the license before commercial use.

Who made Bio Single Cell Splicing?

Bio Single Cell Splicing is published by GPTomics in the GPTomics/bioSkills repository, together with 29 other skills.

Similar skills. From other creators.