Skip to content
alyn
Aaronontheweb

Crap Analysis skill

Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.

$npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill crap-analysis
View this skill on GitHubAaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/skills/crap-analysis/SKILL.md
Pack stars
1,257
Pack installs
23k
Alyn Score
61/99
Updated
13 days ago
License
MIT
– views – installs via Alyn

Aaronontheweb

Crap Analysis

Install Crap Analysis

Pick your agent. Every command is ready to paste.

$npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill crap-analysis

The open skills CLI detects your agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ more) and installs to the right folder. Add -g to install globally.

01

Install it

Run the command above, or upload the folder in Claude.

02

Ask naturally

Describe the task. Your agent loads crap-analysis when the request matches its description.

03

Name it if needed

If it does not trigger, say “use the crap-analysis skill”. In Codex, type $crap-analysis.

The skill itself

SKILL.md

FolderGitHub

CRAP Score Analysis

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Evaluating code quality and test coverage before changes
  • Identifying high-risk code that needs refactoring or testing
  • Setting up coverage collection for a .NET project
  • Prioritizing which code to test based on risk
  • Establishing coverage thresholds for CI/CD pipelines

What is CRAP?

CRAP Score = Complexity x (1 - Coverage)^2

The CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score combines cyclomatic complexity with test coverage to identify risky code.

CRAP Score Risk Level Action Required
< 5 Low Well-tested, maintainable code
5-30 Medium Acceptable but watch complexity
> 30 High Needs tests or refactoring

Why CRAP Matters

  • High complexity + low coverage = danger: Code that's hard to understand AND untested is risky to modify
  • Complexity alone isn't enough: A complex method with 100% coverage is safer than a simple method with 0%
  • Focuses effort: Prioritize testing on complex code, not simple getters/setters

CRAP Score Examples

Method Complexity Coverage Calculation CRAP
GetUserId() 1 0% 1 x (1 - 0)^2 1
ParseToken() 54 52% 54 x (1 - 0.52)^2 12.4
ValidateForm() 20 0% 20 x (1 - 0)^2 20
ProcessOrder() 45 20% 45 x (1 - 0.20)^2 28.8
ImportData() 80 10% 80 x (1 - 0.10)^2 64.8

Coverage Collection Setup

coverage.runsettings

Create a coverage.runsettings file in your repository root. The OpenCover format is required for CRAP score calculation because it includes cyclomatic complexity metrics.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<RunSettings>
  <DataCollectionRunSettings>
    <DataCollectors>
      <DataCollector friendlyName="XPlat code coverage">
        <Configuration>
          <!-- OpenCover format includes cyclomatic complexity for CRAP scores -->
          <Format>cobertura,opencover</Format>

          <!-- Exclude test and benchmark assemblies -->
          <Exclude>[*.Tests]*,[*.Benchmark]*,[*.Migrations]*</Exclude>

          <!-- Exclude generated code, obsolete members, and explicit exclusions -->
          <ExcludeByAttribute>Obsolete,GeneratedCodeAttribute,CompilerGeneratedAttribute,ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute</ExcludeByAttribute>

          <!-- Exclude source-generated files, Blazor generated code, and migrations -->
          <ExcludeByFile>**/obj/**/*,**/*.g.cs,**/*.designer.cs,**/*.razor.g.cs,**/*.razor.css.g.cs,**/Migrations/**/*</ExcludeByFile>

          <!-- Exclude test projects -->
          <IncludeTestAssembly>false</IncludeTestAssembly>

          <!-- Optimization flags -->
          <SingleHit>false</SingleHit>
          <UseSourceLink>true</UseSourceLink>
          <SkipAutoProps>true</SkipAutoProps>
        </Configuration>
      </DataCollector>
    </DataCollectors>
  </DataCollectionRunSettings>
</RunSettings>

Key Configuration Options

Option Purpose
Format Must include opencover for complexity metrics
Exclude Exclude test/benchmark assemblies by pattern
ExcludeByAttribute Skip generated, obsolete, and explicitly excluded code (includes ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute)
ExcludeByFile Skip source-generated files, Blazor components, and migrations
SkipAutoProps Don't count auto-properties as branches

ReportGenerator Installation

Install ReportGenerator as a local tool for generating HTML reports with Risk Hotspots.

Add to .config/dotnet-tools.json

{
  "version": 1,
  "isRoot": true,
  "tools": {
    "dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltool": {
      "version": "5.4.5",
      "commands": ["reportgenerator"],
      "rollForward": false
    }
  }
}

Then restore:

dotnet tool restore

Or Install Globally

dotnet tool install --global dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltool

Collecting Coverage

Run Tests with Coverage Collection

# Clean previous results
rm -rf coverage/ TestResults/

# Run unit tests with coverage
dotnet test tests/MyApp.Tests.Unit \
  --settings coverage.runsettings \
  --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
  --results-directory ./TestResults

# Run integration tests (optional, adds to coverage)
dotnet test tests/MyApp.Tests.Integration \
  --settings coverage.runsettings \
  --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
  --results-directory ./TestResults

Generate HTML Report

dotnet reportgenerator \
  -reports:"TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" \
  -targetdir:"coverage" \
  -reporttypes:"Html;TextSummary;MarkdownSummaryGithub"

Report Types

Type Description Output
Html Full interactive report coverage/index.html
TextSummary Plain text summary coverage/Summary.txt
MarkdownSummaryGithub GitHub-compatible markdown coverage/SummaryGithub.md
Badges SVG badges for README coverage/badge_*.svg
Cobertura Merged Cobertura XML coverage/Cobertura.xml

Reading the Report

Risk Hotspots Section

The HTML report includes a Risk Hotspots section showing methods sorted by complexity:

  • Cyclomatic Complexity: Number of independent paths through code (if/else, switch cases, loops)
  • NPath Complexity: Number of acyclic execution paths (exponential growth with nesting)
  • Crap Score: Calculated from complexity and coverage

Interpreting Results

Risk Hotspots
─────────────
Method                          Complexity  Coverage  Crap Score
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
DataImporter.ParseRecord()      54          52%       12.4
AuthService.ValidateToken()     32          0%        32.0   ← HIGH RISK
OrderProcessor.Calculate()      28          85%       1.3
UserService.CreateUser()        15          100%      0.0

Action items:

  • ValidateToken() has CRAP > 30 with 0% coverage - test immediately or refactor
  • ParseRecord() is complex but has decent coverage - acceptable
  • CreateUser() and Calculate() are well-tested - safe to modify

Coverage Thresholds

Coverage Type Target Action
Line Coverage > 80% Good for most projects
Branch Coverage > 60% Catches conditional logic
CRAP Score < 30 Maximum for new code

Configuring Thresholds

Create coverage.props in your repository:

<Project>
  <PropertyGroup>
    <!-- Coverage thresholds for CI enforcement -->
    <CoverageThresholdLine>80</CoverageThresholdLine>
    <CoverageThresholdBranch>60</CoverageThresholdBranch>
  </PropertyGroup>
</Project>

CI/CD Integration

GitHub Actions

name: Coverage

on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main, dev]

jobs:
  coverage:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Setup .NET
        uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
        with:
          dotnet-version: '9.0.x'

      - name: Restore tools
        run: dotnet tool restore

      - name: Run tests with coverage
        run: |
          dotnet test \
            --settings coverage.runsettings \
            --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
            --results-directory ./TestResults

      - name: Generate report
        run: |
          dotnet reportgenerator \
            -reports:"TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" \
            -targetdir:"coverage" \
            -reporttypes:"Html;MarkdownSummaryGithub;Cobertura"

      - name: Upload coverage report
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: coverage-report
          path: coverage/

      - name: Add coverage to PR
        uses: marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@v2
        with:
          path: coverage/SummaryGithub.md

Azure Pipelines

- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
  displayName: 'Run tests with coverage'
  inputs:
    command: 'test'
    arguments: '--settings coverage.runsettings --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" --results-directory $(Build.SourcesDirectory)/TestResults'

- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
  displayName: 'Generate coverage report'
  inputs:
    command: 'custom'
    custom: 'reportgenerator'
    arguments: '-reports:"$(Build.SourcesDirectory)/TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" -targetdir:"$(Build.SourcesDirectory)/coverage" -reporttypes:"HtmlInline_AzurePipelines;Cobertura"'

- task: PublishCodeCoverageResults@2
  displayName: 'Publish coverage'
  inputs:
    codeCoverageTool: 'Cobertura'
    summaryFileLocation: '$(Build.SourcesDirectory)/coverage/Cobertura.xml'

Quick Reference

One-Liner Commands

# Full analysis workflow
rm -rf coverage/ TestResults/ && \
dotnet test --settings coverage.runsettings \
  --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" \
  --results-directory ./TestResults && \
dotnet reportgenerator \
  -reports:"TestResults/**/coverage.opencover.xml" \
  -targetdir:"coverage" \
  -reporttypes:"Html;TextSummary"

# View summary
cat coverage/Summary.txt

# Open HTML report (Linux)
xdg-open coverage/index.html

# Open HTML report (macOS)
open coverage/index.html

# Open HTML report (Windows)
start coverage/index.html

Project Standards

Metric New Code Legacy Code
Line Coverage 80%+ 60%+ (improve gradually)
Branch Coverage 60%+ 40%+ (improve gradually)
Maximum CRAP 30 Document exceptions
High-risk methods Must have tests Add tests before modifying

What Gets Excluded

The recommended coverage.runsettings excludes:

Pattern Reason
[*.Tests]* Test assemblies aren't production code
[*.Benchmark]* Benchmark projects
[*.Migrations]* Database migrations (generated)
GeneratedCodeAttribute Source generators
CompilerGeneratedAttribute Compiler-generated code
ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute Explicit developer opt-out
*.g.cs, *.designer.cs Generated files
*.razor.g.cs Blazor component generated code
*.razor.css.g.cs Blazor CSS isolation generated code
**/Migrations/**/* EF Core migrations (auto-generated)
SkipAutoProps Auto-properties (trivial branches)

When to Update Thresholds

Lower thresholds temporarily for:

  • Legacy codebases being modernized (document in README)
  • Generated code that can't be modified
  • Third-party wrapper code

Never lower thresholds for:

  • "It's too hard to test" - refactor instead
  • "We'll add tests later" - add them now
  • New features - should meet standards from the start

Additional Resources

Tips for Crap Analysis

  • • Start a fresh session after installing so your agent picks up the new skill.
  • • It is part of a pack with 30 skills. Install only the ones you need with --skill to keep triggers precise.
  • • If two skills overlap, mention the one you want by name.

Questions about Crap Analysis

What does the Crap Analysis skill do?

Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.

How do I install Crap Analysis?

Run "npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill crap-analysis" in your project. The skills CLI installs it for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ other agents. In Claude on the web, upload the skill folder as a ZIP under Customize > Skills.

Does Crap Analysis work in Cursor and Codex?

Yes. Crap Analysis uses the open SKILL.md format, so it works in Claude Code, Claude, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and other agents that support agent skills.

Is Crap Analysis free?

Crap Analysis is open source on GitHub under the MIT license. It is free to install; check the license before commercial use.

Who made Crap Analysis?

Crap Analysis is published by Aaronontheweb in the Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills repository, together with 29 other skills.

Similar skills. From other creators.