Skip to content
alyn
tech-leads-club

Tactical Ddd skill

Detects anemic domain models, validates and refactors them into rich domain models, and enforces tactical DDD patterns (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates, Domain Services, Domain Events). Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check domain models or DDD code; detect anemia; refactor domain objects; improve encapsulation; or mentions terms like "anemic model", "rich domain", "aggregate", "value object", "dom

$npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill tactical-ddd
View this skill on GitHubtech-leads-club/agent-skills/packages/skills-catalog/skills/(architecture)/tactical-ddd/SKILL.md
Pack stars
7,153
Pack installs
22k
Alyn Score
65/99
Updated
6 h ago
– views – installs via Alyn

Install Tactical Ddd

Pick your agent. Every command is ready to paste.

$npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill tactical-ddd

The open skills CLI detects your agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ more) and installs to the right folder. Add -g to install globally.

01

Install it

Run the command above, or upload the folder in Claude.

02

Ask naturally

Describe the task. Your agent loads tactical-ddd when the request matches its description.

03

Name it if needed

If it does not trigger, say “use the tactical-ddd skill”. In Codex, type $tactical-ddd.

The skill itself

SKILL.md

FolderGitHub

Tactical DDD — Rich Domain Modeling

Workflow

Determine the user's intent first:

Intent Phases to run
"validate / review / check / is this correct?" Phase 1 + 2 only → report findings, ask before refactoring
"fix / refactor / improve / clean up" Phase 1 + 2 + 3
"how should I design / model this?" Load reference.md directly

Phase 1 — Detect

Load detection.md and scan the target code for anemia signals. Produce a severity score and list of affected classes.

Phase 2 — Assess

For each affected class, determine the correct building block:

Has unique identity tracked over time? Has invariants tying multiple objects? → Building Block
Yes — Entity
No — Value Object
Yes (root) + children with shared invariants Yes Aggregate
Operation spans multiple Aggregates/doesn't belong to any — Domain Service

Prefer Value Objects over Entities. Prefer small Aggregates over large ones.

If intent was validate/review: stop here. Report findings using the output format below. Ask "Would you like me to apply these fixes?" before proceeding.

Phase 3 — Refactor

Load refactoring.md for step-by-step moves. Apply in this order:

  1. Replace setter chains with a single expressive method
  2. Move service logic into the Aggregate that owns it
  3. Add business guards at the top of each method
  4. Publish a Domain Event after each successful state change
  5. Replace primitive types with Value Objects

For deep pattern questions (boundary design, event modeling, service vs. entity decision), load reference.md.


Quick Anemia Signals (scan first)

public setX() / public setY()        → behaviour should be encapsulated
service.doX(entity, ...)              → logic likely belongs in entity
entity.setA(); entity.setB(); ...     → setter chain = missing intent method
no domain methods beyond getters      → pure data bag

Golden Rules

  1. Behaviour with data — Objects own both state and the operations that change it
  2. Ubiquitous Language — Method names come from the domain, not CRUD (commitTo, not setStatus)
  3. Small Aggregates — Root + Value Objects by default; add child Entities only for true invariants
  4. One transaction = one Aggregate — Cross-Aggregate rules use eventual consistency via Domain Events
  5. Reference by ID — Never hold object references to other Aggregates
  6. Value Objects first — Use Entities only when individual identity is essential
  7. Domain Services sparingly — Excessive services → anemic model
  8. Protect invariants — The Aggregate is the last line of defence; never trust the caller

Output Format

When reviewing code, report:

## Anemia Diagnosis: <ClassName>

Severity: [None | Mild | Moderate | Severe]

Issues:
- <description of problem>

Recommended refactoring:
- <specific move from refactoring.md>

When refactoring, show a before/after diff for each class touched.

Tips for Tactical Ddd

  • • Start a fresh session after installing so your agent picks up the new skill.
  • • It is part of a pack with 30 skills. Install only the ones you need with --skill to keep triggers precise.
  • • If two skills overlap, mention the one you want by name.

Questions about Tactical Ddd

What does the Tactical Ddd skill do?

Detects anemic domain models, validates and refactors them into rich domain models, and enforces tactical DDD patterns (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates, Domain Services, Domain Events). Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check domain models or DDD code; detect anemia; refactor domain objects; improve encapsulation; or mentions terms like "anemic model", "rich domain", "aggregate", "value object", "dom

How do I install Tactical Ddd?

Run "npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill tactical-ddd" in your project. The skills CLI installs it for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ other agents. In Claude on the web, upload the skill folder as a ZIP under Customize > Skills.

Does Tactical Ddd work in Cursor and Codex?

Yes. Tactical Ddd uses the open SKILL.md format, so it works in Claude Code, Claude, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and other agents that support agent skills.

Is Tactical Ddd free?

Tactical Ddd is open source on GitHub. It is free to install; check the license before commercial use.

Who made Tactical Ddd?

Tactical Ddd is published by tech-leads-club in the tech-leads-club/agent-skills repository, together with 29 other skills.

Similar skills. From other creators.